I want to try something out, so would like people's views on it. My idea is to try and get some focused activity going around the concept of the learner of the future. Think of it as either a distributed research process or adding a layer of intentionality over some of what we do in the blogosphere.
I have this feeling that between us there are often very good conversations, excellent resources, great ideas, etc but we don't always take the next step in synthesising or collecting these.
Here is what I have in mind: A loosely coupled, distributed research 'project'. We declare 09 the 'year of future learning' (#YOFL or #FLY - take your pick). I accept that 'the year of X' is a bit naff, and comes with all sorts of anti-arguments, (what about next year?) but as a means of focusing our energies, providing opportunities for review, and giving a broad enough umbrella it provides a useful framework.
This is a means of aggregating existing resources and events by tagging them - in the Weinberger sense, we may as well put our leaves on as many branches as possible, so for instance there will be sessions at Northern Voice and Alt-C which could be made part of the YOFL simply by adding the tag.
But I see it as much more than just another meme or tag, I also want to use it as a means of instigating some new open, distributed activities. I have in mind the following:
- A set of interesting questions generated by the community
- Connected blog posts around particular topics - blog-carnivals Tony has pointed me at
- An open, special edition journal
- Combined research results
- A workshop format that anyone can run, and share results via a wiki
- 'Live' events eg George Siemens' Elluminate sessions
- 'Flash debates' in twitter around a specific topic, which are then summarised
- Face to face sessions at various conferences
- A wiki/blog/site collecting all of this material together
- An end of year review
I want to avoid any perceptions of elitism so the idea is that this is open to anyone. I've emailed a few blog chums to see if they would be interested in doing some of the above, to give it some traction, but essentially it's open. If there is a topic of burning interest to you, run an activity and it'll be pulled in.
In addition, my colleague Grainne Conole also has lots of links into various communities, so we will be running a number of face to face activities also. This involves 'talking to people' - not sure what that is, probably some cool web 2.0 service.
The experiment for me is whether the online community can work this way, or whether it really does need a more directed, formal research project. At the moment I think we have good conversation. Conversations and dialogue can be spontaneous but they can also be focused, with a specific aim. Similarly, we have a loose-knit community of sorts, and communities can be around general areas of interest, but they can also have a common goal ('overthow a president', 'find Dave a date').
It is this second, more intentional layer that I was hoping we might foster this year. I like finding other people's posts and riffing off (or ripping off) ideas, but I want to explore whether the edublog community can do a bit more. Whether we can have purposeful conversations, aimed at addressing a specific problem.
To kick off I have created a wiki here for setting out the big questions.
I am go to aggregate anything with #YOFL and #FLY tags at some point. I make the solemn promise to summarise these once a month and try to put some interpretation to them, although anyone else is also free to do the same of course.
I will also set in motion a few activities, such as those listed above.
So, what do you think? Oh, here's a logo:
Excellent. I like the idea of trying to aggregate "the space between the words".
I'll try and add some (concise) thoughts to the wiki.
Posted by: AJ Cann | 27/01/2009 at 11:33 AM
Oh, and I vote for #yofl.
Posted by: AJ Cann | 27/01/2009 at 11:34 AM
I agree with AJ - yofl. More important that it is unique(ish) than whether it sounds better. So happy with the tag - less keen on what it expands to as why pick just on a year? Could go for "Yo Future Learning" as in "Yo Blair!" or Yet (an)Other Future Learning thing or Yippee Open Free Learning (but that leaps forward to the answer :-)).
Anyway good concept, good idea, good tag (are you thinking about a domain grab?) - and that is probably enough.
Posted by: Patrick | 27/01/2009 at 01:57 PM
Nice idea, Martin. Thanks!
Posted by: Gary Lewis | 27/01/2009 at 10:05 PM
YOFL is definitely more distinctive and memorable than FLY. The process of refining and distillation from wikis et al will be as interesting as the content generated. I look forward to attempting to contribute in a meaningful way.
Posted by: Michael Rees | 28/01/2009 at 11:30 AM
This is an intriguing idea. I'm particularly excited by blog carnivals.
I wonder if Friendfeed might be a useful utility for aggregation of some of the streams. Also, Ning or Wikia could serve as a potential locus of the community - both providing a few more tools than Pbwiki.
Posted by: Dominik Lukes | 28/01/2009 at 01:48 PM
YOFL already has good search engine rankings! It may be taken to mean rolling around on the floor laughing whilst eating diet yoghurt, but I like it. :)
Posted by: Laura | 30/01/2009 at 11:23 AM
Is it the tool or how the tool is being used? The trick may have also been figuring out who could be part of the dialogue. Did you have twitters with some impact to get it running?
Posted by: Bacigalupe | 06/02/2009 at 10:00 PM