« The granularity of education | Main | Academic discourse and another OU blogger »

23/10/2007

Comments

AJ Cann

Strewth mate, you Poms all look like a raw prawn!

Richard Treves

Martin,

I'm enjoying your train of thought from down under and I agree that web 2.0 brings opportunities to disentangle the traditional model of University teaching. However, the problem with the web as destructive technology in HE is that physical presence is still very valuble. For all its excellence the Open University UK still has a very high drop out rate over first year courses when compared to face to face traditional Universities (unless something very radical has changed in the 5 years since I was there). I put this down to the social value of sharing a physical space.

Its perfectly possible for students to gather bits of informal learning together and point out its educational value. I just question how many students have the motivation to do that when they are physically remote from each other and have no formal curriculum to follow.

Rich

Martin

You're absolutely right Richard - an often overlooked factor is the convenience universities offer by timetabling and placing lectures in physical locations. This takes an enormous burden off the individual and manages their learning for them. It also provides a strong motivational factor in being part of a cohort. However, I think some of the social network stuff offers another means of achieving this, both at a distance and on campus, which is why it seems so appealing to higher ed.
Martin

The comments to this entry are closed.

Flickr

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from edtechie99. Make your own badge here.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter