« Digital scholarship recognition - the debate | Main | Digital scholarship = unspoiled holiday destination »

08/07/2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c0c0e53ef01543390fc6e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Categorisation angst, the monoamorous and Google+:

Comments

Mark Power

I absolutely blummin' well agree. Social fragmentation tools!

Laura James

I like my fragmentation. Professional on twitter, personal on facebook.

Alan

Facebook has certainly tainted the "friend" term, where it is built by one click, but not really for my own personal sense of it. I am glad you consider me a never met friend (as I feel the same way), and it is my continued pleasure to develop online friendships that never surprise me once I get to meet those people. In fact, I am getting more than my share of closing those real circles on my current trip around the US and Canada.

Frankly I am wary of a social space where I selectively communicate with people via such channels, it is the thing about twitter that I can say things I mean for a certain group of people, but it really is said in public. I worry that circles may become a bit silo-ish, but also realize it is too freaking new to be drawing the conclusions that people are doing in such wave-like fashion.

But I get what you are implying, we may have presences on many of these services, but invariably we put our effort in one camp.

Grainne Conole

Hi I agree with you and George - have colleagues who are also friends, but my 'real; friends don't tend to be in these social networking spaces. Also agree that the circles + hangout feature could be useful for both research groups and learners. Dipped into a hangout last night that Stephen Downes set up was very good I must say.

Spacemonki

Hello, you don't know me, but I like the cut of your jib.

So, I've been thinking about where Google+ fits in and why it currently fragments.

For quite some time, I've felt slight unease with term 'friend' when drawing boundaries within online relationships. I used to only have work colleagues who I'd drink with in the pub as my FB friends; then I got an email from one work colleague asking me why I hadn't accepted their friend request? An awkward email exchange ensued.
I changed my policy sometime later, with the main reason being that I would consider anyone a friend and control access via the privileges. Then, a work colleague raised an issue regarding content I published as being inappropriate for work colleagues. I've had the same issue with Twitter - I might tweet a thought regarding an issue within the workplace and suddenly I'm being politely asked to refrain. Ultimately, I decided that I would block all work colleagues from both Twitter and Facebook with the exception of four or five work colleagues who are genuinely friends outside of the office and whom I've said that I may tweet or post a status update that expresses an opinion that might be considered inappropriate for the workplace. Its a Follower/Friend beware policy.

So along comes Google+ and suddenly, I have exactly what I felt SNS lacked - circles; an easy way for me to define and manage the social boundary lines. The drawback of course, is that I now have Twitter, FB and Google+ to maintain ... and three is a crowd. I don't want to close my FB account as this is the preferred choice of SNS for many people I'd lost contact with and am delighted to remain in touch with. Twitter, great to follow many people I enjoy feeling contected with (Stephen Fry for example). Google+ ... after the initial joy of having SNS done smart, the reality is simply that I'm using it less because its additional time to spend on less reach than either Twitter or FB.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Flickr

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from edtechie99. Make your own badge here.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter